Skip to main content

Current Research

Below is my academic research. Jump to my Projects, Public Writing, Reviews, Data or Teaching to see other aspects of my work.

Works in Progress:

Cybersecurity, Race, and the Politics of Ignorance
Jeff Whyte, Scott Timcke

Contemporary discourses of cyberwarfare stress the significance of 'truth itself' as an object of insecurity in a geopolitically contested information environment. Adversaries of 'the West' are said to produce a 'post-truth era' by 'waging war on information itself', especially on social media. Consequently, not just information, but ideas surrounding 'truth itself' have been folded into new conceptualizations of security that hinge on the contingencies of knowledge and ignorance. Our case study concerns how cyberwarfare experts assert that #BlackLivesMatters activists unwittingly aid adversarial states by 'sowing division' within the United States. Drawing upon Charles Mills' arguments concerning 'epistemologies of ignorance' and racialized 'ways of knowing' we discuss how these experts subsume Black activism within a political imaginary of ignorance and insecurity. While cyberwarfare experts frame themselves as arbiters of truth, we argue that these discourses are themselves the product of long-cultivated and militant forms of 'white ignorance' concerning not only the history of Black activism, but also methods used for its suppression. We conclude that contemporary cybersecurity is not a cumulative project to replace ignorance with knowledge, but a project to manage the contingent circulation of knowledge and ignorance in configurations optimal to the goals of statecraft.

Here is a slide show of this project.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Reactionary Mask

Reactionary politics the world over is hardly known for its robust intellectual foundation. Whether Donald Trump or Jair Bolsonaro, the core of this politics is built upon “the felt experience of having power, seeing it threatened, and trying to win it back,” as Corey Robin has noted. This is not to suggest that reactionaries are thoughtless. Rather that many of their justifications are contrived because they are driven simply by the desire to strike back at the “the emancipation of the lower orders.” For example, Edmond Burke’s objection to the French Revolution has less to do with its gratuitous violence and more to do with the overhaul of established deference and command. Indeed, conservatism claims that unequal relationships need to be preserved, as they are necessary for the advancement of civilization. Burke plays up the violence to create an affective charge in service of that agenda. Which brings us to David Bullard. Bullard is a minor figure in the small world of the South A...
Post a Comment
Read more

Derrida Playing Cricket.

  I will never be the better theorist, but I can rest assured that I am the better batsman.
Post a Comment
Read more

Rawls, Violence, and the State

Given the rise of the security state, one critique Rawls' work increasingly faces is that he did not give enough due attention to the problems of war and the violent capacity of the state. As an example, Paul Kahn in  Political Theology  charges that “Rawls and his followers never took seriously the violence of the state,” because the threat of “mutual assured destruction never appears within liberal political theory.” Further “the defence policies of the United States are always seen as somehow exceptional—more transitional arrangements than expressions of national identity.”  (Of secondary interest, Kahn holds that state violence derives less from conflict about political identity and affiliation, and more from the deeper realm of the apparent lawful order wherein“political violence has been and remains a form of sacrifice.” For Kahn the disadvantage of the majority of liberal political theory is that it cannot make that identification for “not reason but decision de...
Post a Comment
Read more